fix: tighten vague language across all prompt files
- Remove blanket "write tests" instructions; tests only when acceptance criteria require them - Replace arbitrary "30-50% rejection rate" with clear directive - Replace "4/5 threshold" with "majority of claims" rule - List concrete quality gate commands instead of "whatever project uses" - Remove "learnings" from progress summary (too vague) - Make error-leak pattern generic (not HTTP-specific) - Align fix evaluator with updated test expectations
This commit is contained in:
@@ -17,4 +17,4 @@ You are evaluating an implementation story. The generator claims to have built a
|
||||
- Code exists but doesn't actually run
|
||||
- Removed an import or variable during refactoring but it's still used elsewhere in the file
|
||||
- New instance of a shared resource (e.g., DB connection, rate limiter) instead of using the existing one
|
||||
- Error details leaked to HTTP responses (use logging server-side, return generic message to client)
|
||||
- Internal error details (stack traces, exception messages) exposed in user-facing output instead of being logged server-side
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user